Per Lea vs Alfred Charles Lilleeng
NOR/SC2011 (NOR), 2011 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Per Lea vs Alfred Charles Lilleeng with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Per Lea (1792)
- Black
- Alfred Charles Lilleeng (2155)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- NOR/SC2011 (NOR)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Per Lea (1792) and Alfred Charles Lilleeng (2155) was played at NOR/SC2011 (NOR) in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Per Lea games or Alfred Charles Lilleeng games? This Per Lea vs Alfred Charles Lilleeng encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Per Lea vs Alfred Charles Lilleeng?
Per Lea vs Alfred Charles Lilleeng (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Per Lea vs Alfred Charles Lilleeng?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO C13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Per Lea vs Alfred Charles Lilleeng, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.