Quang Liem Le vs Kr1 Szabo
FSGM September, 2005 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Quang Liem Le vs Kr1 Szabo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Quang Liem Le (2326)
- Black
- Kr1 Szabo (2422)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FSGM September
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Quang Liem Le (2326) and Kr1 Szabo (2422) was played at FSGM September in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Quang Liem Le games or Kr1 Szabo games? This Quang Liem Le vs Kr1 Szabo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Quang Liem Le vs Kr1 Szabo?
Quang Liem Le vs Kr1 Szabo (2005) finished 1–0, a win for Quang Liem Le.
What opening was played in Quang Liem Le vs Kr1 Szabo?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (ECO D29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Quang Liem Le vs Kr1 Szabo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.