Goran Lazarevic vs Zoran V Lazarevic
2013 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Goran Lazarevic vs Zoran V Lazarevic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Goran Lazarevic (2051)
- Black
- Zoran V Lazarevic (2122)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Goran Lazarevic (2051) and Zoran V Lazarevic (2122) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Goran Lazarevic games or Zoran V Lazarevic games? This Goran Lazarevic vs Zoran V Lazarevic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Goran Lazarevic vs Zoran V Lazarevic?
Goran Lazarevic vs Zoran V Lazarevic (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Zoran V Lazarevic.
What opening was played in Goran Lazarevic vs Zoran V Lazarevic?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Goran Lazarevic vs Zoran V Lazarevic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.