Colea-Valentin Lazarean vs Peter Hohler
World Senior 65+ 2019, 2019 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Colea-Valentin Lazarean vs Peter Hohler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Colea-Valentin Lazarean (1744)
- Black
- Peter Hohler (2059)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- World Senior 65+ 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Colea-Valentin Lazarean (1744) and Peter Hohler (2059) was played at World Senior 65+ 2019 in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Colea-Valentin Lazarean games or Peter Hohler games? This Colea-Valentin Lazarean vs Peter Hohler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Colea-Valentin Lazarean vs Peter Hohler?
Colea-Valentin Lazarean vs Peter Hohler (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Peter Hohler.
What opening was played in Colea-Valentin Lazarean vs Peter Hohler?
The game opened with the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (ECO A18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Colea-Valentin Lazarean vs Peter Hohler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.