Szabolcs Laza vs Zoltan Vargyas
Duna Open 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (E79).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Szabolcs Laza vs Zoltan Vargyas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Szabolcs Laza (2150)
- Black
- Zoltan Vargyas (2094)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Duna Open 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (E79)
About this chess game
This chess game between Szabolcs Laza (2150) and Zoltan Vargyas (2094) was played at Duna Open 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (E79). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Szabolcs Laza games or Zoltan Vargyas games? This Szabolcs Laza vs Zoltan Vargyas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Szabolcs Laza vs Zoltan Vargyas?
Szabolcs Laza vs Zoltan Vargyas (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Szabolcs Laza.
What opening was played in Szabolcs Laza vs Zoltan Vargyas?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (ECO E79).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Szabolcs Laza vs Zoltan Vargyas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.