Nikolay Lavrov vs Sergei Khamitskiy
2007 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nikolay Lavrov vs Sergei Khamitskiy with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nikolay Lavrov (1145)
- Black
- Sergei Khamitskiy (2426)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nikolay Lavrov (1145) and Sergei Khamitskiy (2426) was played in 2007 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nikolay Lavrov games or Sergei Khamitskiy games? This Nikolay Lavrov vs Sergei Khamitskiy encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nikolay Lavrov vs Sergei Khamitskiy?
Nikolay Lavrov vs Sergei Khamitskiy (2007) finished 0–1, a win for Sergei Khamitskiy.
What opening was played in Nikolay Lavrov vs Sergei Khamitskiy?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (ECO C06).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nikolay Lavrov vs Sergei Khamitskiy, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.