Dominik Laux vs Adam Stolarczyk
Bydgoszcz Open A 2022, 2022 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dominik Laux vs Adam Stolarczyk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dominik Laux (2320)
- Black
- Adam Stolarczyk (2125)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Bydgoszcz Open A 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dominik Laux (2320) and Adam Stolarczyk (2125) was played at Bydgoszcz Open A 2022 in 2022 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dominik Laux games or Adam Stolarczyk games? This Dominik Laux vs Adam Stolarczyk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dominik Laux vs Adam Stolarczyk?
Dominik Laux vs Adam Stolarczyk (2022) finished 1–0, a win for Dominik Laux.
What opening was played in Dominik Laux vs Adam Stolarczyk?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (ECO B11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dominik Laux vs Adam Stolarczyk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.