Ludger Lautenschuetz vs Manfred Menacher
21. Open, 2004 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ludger Lautenschuetz vs Manfred Menacher with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ludger Lautenschuetz (2113)
- Black
- Manfred Menacher (2341)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 21. Open
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ludger Lautenschuetz (2113) and Manfred Menacher (2341) was played at 21. Open in 2004 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ludger Lautenschuetz games or Manfred Menacher games? This Ludger Lautenschuetz vs Manfred Menacher encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ludger Lautenschuetz vs Manfred Menacher?
Ludger Lautenschuetz vs Manfred Menacher (2004) finished 0–1, a win for Manfred Menacher.
What opening was played in Ludger Lautenschuetz vs Manfred Menacher?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO E21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ludger Lautenschuetz vs Manfred Menacher, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.