Pierre Laurent-Paoli vs Philippe Brochet
15. Condom IM 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pierre Laurent-Paoli vs Philippe Brochet with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pierre Laurent-Paoli (2347)
- Black
- Philippe Brochet (2392)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 15. Condom IM 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pierre Laurent-Paoli (2347) and Philippe Brochet (2392) was played at 15. Condom IM 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pierre Laurent-Paoli games or Philippe Brochet games? This Pierre Laurent-Paoli vs Philippe Brochet encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pierre Laurent-Paoli vs Philippe Brochet?
Pierre Laurent-Paoli vs Philippe Brochet (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Philippe Brochet.
What opening was played in Pierre Laurent-Paoli vs Philippe Brochet?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (ECO E16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pierre Laurent-Paoli vs Philippe Brochet, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.