Franklin Leandro Latorre vs Juan Alejandro Leon Acevedo
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Franklin Leandro Latorre vs Juan Alejandro Leon Acevedo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Franklin Leandro Latorre (1895)
- Black
- Juan Alejandro Leon Acevedo (1529)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Franklin Leandro Latorre (1895) and Juan Alejandro Leon Acevedo (1529) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Franklin Leandro Latorre games or Juan Alejandro Leon Acevedo games? This Franklin Leandro Latorre vs Juan Alejandro Leon Acevedo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Franklin Leandro Latorre vs Juan Alejandro Leon Acevedo?
Franklin Leandro Latorre vs Juan Alejandro Leon Acevedo (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Franklin Leandro Latorre vs Juan Alejandro Leon Acevedo?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Franklin Leandro Latorre vs Juan Alejandro Leon Acevedo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.