Yunus Latib vs Alcindo Luz Bastos Da Silva Filho
RB-00100, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Yunus Latib vs Alcindo Luz Bastos Da Silva Filho with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Yunus Latib (2215)
- Black
- Alcindo Luz Bastos Da Silva Filho (1915)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- RB-00100
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Yunus Latib (2215) and Alcindo Luz Bastos Da Silva Filho (1915) was played at RB-00100 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Yunus Latib games or Alcindo Luz Bastos Da Silva Filho games? This Yunus Latib vs Alcindo Luz Bastos Da Silva Filho encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Yunus Latib vs Alcindo Luz Bastos Da Silva Filho?
Yunus Latib vs Alcindo Luz Bastos Da Silva Filho (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Yunus Latib.
What opening was played in Yunus Latib vs Alcindo Luz Bastos Da Silva Filho?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Yunus Latib vs Alcindo Luz Bastos Da Silva Filho, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.