Cesar Lasanta Rica vs Javier Palacian Campodarve
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense (D60).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Cesar Lasanta Rica vs Javier Palacian Campodarve with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Cesar Lasanta Rica (2282)
- Black
- Javier Palacian Campodarve (1813)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense (D60)
About this chess game
This chess game between Cesar Lasanta Rica (2282) and Javier Palacian Campodarve (1813) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense (D60). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Cesar Lasanta Rica games or Javier Palacian Campodarve games? This Cesar Lasanta Rica vs Javier Palacian Campodarve encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Cesar Lasanta Rica vs Javier Palacian Campodarve?
Cesar Lasanta Rica vs Javier Palacian Campodarve finished 1–0, a win for Cesar Lasanta Rica.
What opening was played in Cesar Lasanta Rica vs Javier Palacian Campodarve?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense (ECO D60).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Cesar Lasanta Rica vs Javier Palacian Campodarve, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.