Mark Lapidus vs Lukah Connolly Sams
123. ch-SCO Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mark Lapidus vs Lukah Connolly Sams with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mark Lapidus (2221)
- Black
- Lukah Connolly Sams (1498)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 123. ch-SCO Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mark Lapidus (2221) and Lukah Connolly Sams (1498) was played at 123. ch-SCO Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mark Lapidus games or Lukah Connolly Sams games? This Mark Lapidus vs Lukah Connolly Sams encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mark Lapidus vs Lukah Connolly Sams?
Mark Lapidus vs Lukah Connolly Sams (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Mark Lapidus.
What opening was played in Mark Lapidus vs Lukah Connolly Sams?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mark Lapidus vs Lukah Connolly Sams, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.