Giuliano Lanzani vs Alessandro Bonanno
1. Alimini Village Open, 2011 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Giuliano Lanzani vs Alessandro Bonanno with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Giuliano Lanzani (1970)
- Black
- Alessandro Bonanno (2142)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 1. Alimini Village Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74)
About this chess game
This chess game between Giuliano Lanzani (1970) and Alessandro Bonanno (2142) was played at 1. Alimini Village Open in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Giuliano Lanzani games or Alessandro Bonanno games? This Giuliano Lanzani vs Alessandro Bonanno encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Giuliano Lanzani vs Alessandro Bonanno?
Giuliano Lanzani vs Alessandro Bonanno (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Giuliano Lanzani.
What opening was played in Giuliano Lanzani vs Alessandro Bonanno?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (ECO E74).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Giuliano Lanzani vs Alessandro Bonanno, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.