Herb Langer vs Daniel Wells
24. ch-NATO 2013, 2013 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Herb Langer vs Daniel Wells with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Herb Langer (1820)
- Black
- Daniel Wells (2023)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 24. ch-NATO 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Herb Langer (1820) and Daniel Wells (2023) was played at 24. ch-NATO 2013 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Herb Langer games or Daniel Wells games? This Herb Langer vs Daniel Wells encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Herb Langer vs Daniel Wells?
Herb Langer vs Daniel Wells (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Wells.
What opening was played in Herb Langer vs Daniel Wells?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (ECO A36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Herb Langer vs Daniel Wells, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.