Philip Landgren vs David Nygren
TCh-SWE Elite 2012-13, 2013 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Philip Landgren vs David Nygren with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Philip Landgren (2243)
- Black
- David Nygren (2175)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TCh-SWE Elite 2012-13
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Philip Landgren (2243) and David Nygren (2175) was played at TCh-SWE Elite 2012-13 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Philip Landgren games or David Nygren games? This Philip Landgren vs David Nygren encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Philip Landgren vs David Nygren?
Philip Landgren vs David Nygren (2013) finished 0–1, a win for David Nygren.
What opening was played in Philip Landgren vs David Nygren?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Philip Landgren vs David Nygren, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.