Konstantinos-Georgios Lamprou vs Georgios Beliotis
2016 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Konstantinos-Georgios Lamprou vs Georgios Beliotis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Konstantinos-Georgios Lamprou (1587)
- Black
- Georgios Beliotis (1906)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54)
About this chess game
This chess game between Konstantinos-Georgios Lamprou (1587) and Georgios Beliotis (1906) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Konstantinos-Georgios Lamprou games or Georgios Beliotis games? This Konstantinos-Georgios Lamprou vs Georgios Beliotis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Konstantinos-Georgios Lamprou vs Georgios Beliotis?
Konstantinos-Georgios Lamprou vs Georgios Beliotis (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Georgios Beliotis.
What opening was played in Konstantinos-Georgios Lamprou vs Georgios Beliotis?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Classical Variation (ECO C54).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Konstantinos-Georgios Lamprou vs Georgios Beliotis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.