Charles Lamoureux vs Eric Dextre
Paris Ch Paris FRA, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Charles Lamoureux vs Eric Dextre with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Charles Lamoureux (2295)
- Black
- Eric Dextre (2205)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Paris Ch Paris FRA
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Charles Lamoureux (2295) and Eric Dextre (2205) was played at Paris Ch Paris FRA and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Charles Lamoureux games or Eric Dextre games? This Charles Lamoureux vs Eric Dextre encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Charles Lamoureux vs Eric Dextre?
Charles Lamoureux vs Eric Dextre finished 1–0, a win for Charles Lamoureux.
What opening was played in Charles Lamoureux vs Eric Dextre?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (ECO B57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Charles Lamoureux vs Eric Dextre, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.