Lukasz Lambucki vs Zbigniew Zielinski
2013 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca System (D67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lukasz Lambucki vs Zbigniew Zielinski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lukasz Lambucki (1829)
- Black
- Zbigniew Zielinski (1843)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca System (D67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lukasz Lambucki (1829) and Zbigniew Zielinski (1843) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca System (D67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lukasz Lambucki games or Zbigniew Zielinski games? This Lukasz Lambucki vs Zbigniew Zielinski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lukasz Lambucki vs Zbigniew Zielinski?
Lukasz Lambucki vs Zbigniew Zielinski (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Lukasz Lambucki vs Zbigniew Zielinski?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca System (ECO D67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lukasz Lambucki vs Zbigniew Zielinski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.