Marcos Laino Alvarez vs Eduardo Barrio Pareja
2014 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcos Laino Alvarez vs Eduardo Barrio Pareja with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcos Laino Alvarez (1920)
- Black
- Eduardo Barrio Pareja (2100)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcos Laino Alvarez (1920) and Eduardo Barrio Pareja (2100) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcos Laino Alvarez games or Eduardo Barrio Pareja games? This Marcos Laino Alvarez vs Eduardo Barrio Pareja encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcos Laino Alvarez vs Eduardo Barrio Pareja?
Marcos Laino Alvarez vs Eduardo Barrio Pareja (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Marcos Laino Alvarez vs Eduardo Barrio Pareja?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcos Laino Alvarez vs Eduardo Barrio Pareja, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.