Leo Lahdenmäki vs Jozef Van Esbroeck
BEL-FIN/S, 2008 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leo Lahdenmäki vs Jozef Van Esbroeck with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leo Lahdenmäki (2105)
- Black
- Jozef Van Esbroeck (1517)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- BEL-FIN/S
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leo Lahdenmäki (2105) and Jozef Van Esbroeck (1517) was played at BEL-FIN/S in 2008 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leo Lahdenmäki games or Jozef Van Esbroeck games? This Leo Lahdenmäki vs Jozef Van Esbroeck encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leo Lahdenmäki vs Jozef Van Esbroeck?
Leo Lahdenmäki vs Jozef Van Esbroeck (2008) finished 0–1, a win for Jozef Van Esbroeck.
What opening was played in Leo Lahdenmäki vs Jozef Van Esbroeck?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (ECO C66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leo Lahdenmäki vs Jozef Van Esbroeck, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.