Jose Maria Laguna Echeverria vs Pablo Sanchez Sanz
2010 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Maria Laguna Echeverria vs Pablo Sanchez Sanz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Maria Laguna Echeverria (1632)
- Black
- Pablo Sanchez Sanz (1785)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Maria Laguna Echeverria (1632) and Pablo Sanchez Sanz (1785) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Maria Laguna Echeverria games or Pablo Sanchez Sanz games? This Jose Maria Laguna Echeverria vs Pablo Sanchez Sanz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Maria Laguna Echeverria vs Pablo Sanchez Sanz?
Jose Maria Laguna Echeverria vs Pablo Sanchez Sanz (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jose Maria Laguna Echeverria vs Pablo Sanchez Sanz?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Maria Laguna Echeverria vs Pablo Sanchez Sanz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.