Salvatore Lagrotteria vs Emanuel Hoegl
43. St Veit Open 2024, 2024 · Result ½–½ · Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Salvatore Lagrotteria vs Emanuel Hoegl with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Salvatore Lagrotteria (1990)
- Black
- Emanuel Hoegl (2167)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 43. St Veit Open 2024
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Salvatore Lagrotteria (1990) and Emanuel Hoegl (2167) was played at 43. St Veit Open 2024 in 2024 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Salvatore Lagrotteria games or Emanuel Hoegl games? This Salvatore Lagrotteria vs Emanuel Hoegl encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Salvatore Lagrotteria vs Emanuel Hoegl?
Salvatore Lagrotteria vs Emanuel Hoegl (2024) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Salvatore Lagrotteria vs Emanuel Hoegl?
The game opened with the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (ECO A07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Salvatore Lagrotteria vs Emanuel Hoegl, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.