Patryk Lagowski vs Michal Platek
2007 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Patryk Lagowski vs Michal Platek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Patryk Lagowski (2335)
- Black
- Michal Platek (1959)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Patryk Lagowski (2335) and Michal Platek (1959) was played in 2007 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Patryk Lagowski games or Michal Platek games? This Patryk Lagowski vs Michal Platek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Patryk Lagowski vs Michal Platek?
Patryk Lagowski vs Michal Platek (2007) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Patryk Lagowski vs Michal Platek?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (ECO D29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Patryk Lagowski vs Michal Platek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.