Patryk Lagowski vs Piotr Dobrowolski
2009 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Patryk Lagowski vs Piotr Dobrowolski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Patryk Lagowski (2324)
- Black
- Piotr Dobrowolski (2389)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Patryk Lagowski (2324) and Piotr Dobrowolski (2389) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Patryk Lagowski games or Piotr Dobrowolski games? This Patryk Lagowski vs Piotr Dobrowolski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Patryk Lagowski vs Piotr Dobrowolski?
Patryk Lagowski vs Piotr Dobrowolski (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Piotr Dobrowolski.
What opening was played in Patryk Lagowski vs Piotr Dobrowolski?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Patryk Lagowski vs Piotr Dobrowolski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.