Henry Lagergren vs David Carswell
WS/O/736, 2014 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Henry Lagergren vs David Carswell with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Henry Lagergren (1903)
- Black
- David Carswell
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/O/736
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Henry Lagergren (1903) and David Carswell was played at WS/O/736 in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Henry Lagergren games or David Carswell games? This Henry Lagergren vs David Carswell encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Henry Lagergren vs David Carswell?
Henry Lagergren vs David Carswell (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Henry Lagergren.
What opening was played in Henry Lagergren vs David Carswell?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Henry Lagergren vs David Carswell, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.