Franciszek Ladzinski vs Dariusz Roubo
POL Team Ch U20 2. div, date unknown · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Analyze this game
Open Franciszek Ladzinski vs Dariusz Roubo on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Franciszek Ladzinski (2013)
- Black
- Dariusz Roubo (2030)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- POL Team Ch U20 2. div
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Franciszek Ladzinski (2013) and Dariusz Roubo (2030) was played at POL Team Ch U20 2. div and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Franciszek Ladzinski games or Dariusz Roubo games? This Franciszek Ladzinski vs Dariusz Roubo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Franciszek Ladzinski vs Dariusz Roubo?
Franciszek Ladzinski vs Dariusz Roubo finished 1–0, a win for Franciszek Ladzinski.
What opening was played in Franciszek Ladzinski vs Dariusz Roubo?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Franciszek Ladzinski vs Dariusz Roubo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.