Ramón Lado Rodríguez vs Antonio Juárez de Vena
ESP/Cup14/pr6 (ESP), 2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack (B86).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ramón Lado Rodríguez vs Antonio Juárez de Vena with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ramón Lado Rodríguez
- Black
- Antonio Juárez de Vena (2106)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ESP/Cup14/pr6 (ESP)
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack (B86)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ramón Lado Rodríguez and Antonio Juárez de Vena (2106) was played at ESP/Cup14/pr6 (ESP) in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack (B86). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ramón Lado Rodríguez games or Antonio Juárez de Vena games? This Ramón Lado Rodríguez vs Antonio Juárez de Vena encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ramón Lado Rodríguez vs Antonio Juárez de Vena?
Ramón Lado Rodríguez vs Antonio Juárez de Vena (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ramón Lado Rodríguez vs Antonio Juárez de Vena?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack (ECO B86).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ramón Lado Rodríguez vs Antonio Juárez de Vena, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.