Aleksandra Lach vs Barbara Jaracz
Warszawa POL, Women Ch 2011, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksandra Lach vs Barbara Jaracz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksandra Lach (2172)
- Black
- Barbara Jaracz (2274)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Warszawa POL, Women Ch 2011
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksandra Lach (2172) and Barbara Jaracz (2274) was played at Warszawa POL, Women Ch 2011 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksandra Lach games or Barbara Jaracz games? This Aleksandra Lach vs Barbara Jaracz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksandra Lach vs Barbara Jaracz?
Aleksandra Lach vs Barbara Jaracz (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Barbara Jaracz.
What opening was played in Aleksandra Lach vs Barbara Jaracz?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (ECO C86).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksandra Lach vs Barbara Jaracz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.