Ivan Lacaci Otero vs Sebastian Reyes Penas
2013 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivan Lacaci Otero vs Sebastian Reyes Penas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivan Lacaci Otero (1671)
- Black
- Sebastian Reyes Penas (1415)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivan Lacaci Otero (1671) and Sebastian Reyes Penas (1415) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivan Lacaci Otero games or Sebastian Reyes Penas games? This Ivan Lacaci Otero vs Sebastian Reyes Penas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivan Lacaci Otero vs Sebastian Reyes Penas?
Ivan Lacaci Otero vs Sebastian Reyes Penas (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Ivan Lacaci Otero.
What opening was played in Ivan Lacaci Otero vs Sebastian Reyes Penas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivan Lacaci Otero vs Sebastian Reyes Penas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.