Victor Labussiere vs Ricardo Manhaes Seabra
2017 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Victor Labussiere vs Ricardo Manhaes Seabra with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Victor Labussiere (1624)
- Black
- Ricardo Manhaes Seabra (1893)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Victor Labussiere (1624) and Ricardo Manhaes Seabra (1893) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Victor Labussiere games or Ricardo Manhaes Seabra games? This Victor Labussiere vs Ricardo Manhaes Seabra encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Victor Labussiere vs Ricardo Manhaes Seabra?
Victor Labussiere vs Ricardo Manhaes Seabra (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Victor Labussiere vs Ricardo Manhaes Seabra?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Victor Labussiere vs Ricardo Manhaes Seabra, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.