Zbigniew Labus vs Michal Nisztuk
Karvina Open 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Zbigniew Labus vs Michal Nisztuk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Zbigniew Labus (1955)
- Black
- Michal Nisztuk (1649)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Karvina Open 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Zbigniew Labus (1955) and Michal Nisztuk (1649) was played at Karvina Open 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Zbigniew Labus games or Michal Nisztuk games? This Zbigniew Labus vs Michal Nisztuk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Zbigniew Labus vs Michal Nisztuk?
Zbigniew Labus vs Michal Nisztuk (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Zbigniew Labus.
What opening was played in Zbigniew Labus vs Michal Nisztuk?
The game opened with the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO A12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Zbigniew Labus vs Michal Nisztuk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.