Jasmin Laake vs Melinda Toth-Goczo
Frauenbundesliga 2013-14, 2014 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jasmin Laake vs Melinda Toth-Goczo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jasmin Laake (2036)
- Black
- Melinda Toth-Goczo (2227)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Frauenbundesliga 2013-14
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jasmin Laake (2036) and Melinda Toth-Goczo (2227) was played at Frauenbundesliga 2013-14 in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jasmin Laake games or Melinda Toth-Goczo games? This Jasmin Laake vs Melinda Toth-Goczo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jasmin Laake vs Melinda Toth-Goczo?
Jasmin Laake vs Melinda Toth-Goczo (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Melinda Toth-Goczo.
What opening was played in Jasmin Laake vs Melinda Toth-Goczo?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (ECO C07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jasmin Laake vs Melinda Toth-Goczo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.