Janusz Kwiek vs Roman Bieganowski
Corr ch34-Poland, 1994 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Janusz Kwiek vs Roman Bieganowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Janusz Kwiek (2086)
- Black
- Roman Bieganowski (1922)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Corr ch34-Poland
- Year
- 1994
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Janusz Kwiek (2086) and Roman Bieganowski (1922) was played at Corr ch34-Poland in 1994 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Janusz Kwiek games or Roman Bieganowski games? This Janusz Kwiek vs Roman Bieganowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Janusz Kwiek vs Roman Bieganowski?
Janusz Kwiek vs Roman Bieganowski (1994) finished 1–0, a win for Janusz Kwiek.
What opening was played in Janusz Kwiek vs Roman Bieganowski?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (ECO D87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Janusz Kwiek vs Roman Bieganowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.