Jacek Kwiatkowski vs Adam Wozniak
Corr Poland, 1995 · Result 0–1 · King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (C38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacek Kwiatkowski vs Adam Wozniak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacek Kwiatkowski (1890)
- Black
- Adam Wozniak (1460)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Corr Poland
- Year
- 1995
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (C38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacek Kwiatkowski (1890) and Adam Wozniak (1460) was played at Corr Poland in 1995 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (C38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacek Kwiatkowski games or Adam Wozniak games? This Jacek Kwiatkowski vs Adam Wozniak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacek Kwiatkowski vs Adam Wozniak?
Jacek Kwiatkowski vs Adam Wozniak (1995) finished 0–1, a win for Adam Wozniak.
What opening was played in Jacek Kwiatkowski vs Adam Wozniak?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (ECO C38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacek Kwiatkowski vs Adam Wozniak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.