Galina Kuteneva vs Veronica Tatarska
LWC11/sf02, 2014 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Galina Kuteneva vs Veronica Tatarska with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Galina Kuteneva (1871)
- Black
- Veronica Tatarska (1983)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- LWC11/sf02
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Galina Kuteneva (1871) and Veronica Tatarska (1983) was played at LWC11/sf02 in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Galina Kuteneva games or Veronica Tatarska games? This Galina Kuteneva vs Veronica Tatarska encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Galina Kuteneva vs Veronica Tatarska?
Galina Kuteneva vs Veronica Tatarska (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Galina Kuteneva.
What opening was played in Galina Kuteneva vs Veronica Tatarska?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Galina Kuteneva vs Veronica Tatarska, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.