Natallia Kusenkova vs Jacek Wisniewski
XXXV Zamenhofa Memorial, 2016 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Natallia Kusenkova vs Jacek Wisniewski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Natallia Kusenkova (2163)
- Black
- Jacek Wisniewski (1084)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- XXXV Zamenhofa Memorial
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Natallia Kusenkova (2163) and Jacek Wisniewski (1084) was played at XXXV Zamenhofa Memorial in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Natallia Kusenkova games or Jacek Wisniewski games? This Natallia Kusenkova vs Jacek Wisniewski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Natallia Kusenkova vs Jacek Wisniewski?
Natallia Kusenkova vs Jacek Wisniewski (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Jacek Wisniewski.
What opening was played in Natallia Kusenkova vs Jacek Wisniewski?
The game opened with the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (ECO A08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Natallia Kusenkova vs Jacek Wisniewski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.