Jakub Kusa vs Safar Harutyunyan
2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jakub Kusa vs Safar Harutyunyan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jakub Kusa (1567)
- Black
- Safar Harutyunyan (1867)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jakub Kusa (1567) and Safar Harutyunyan (1867) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jakub Kusa games or Safar Harutyunyan games? This Jakub Kusa vs Safar Harutyunyan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jakub Kusa vs Safar Harutyunyan?
Jakub Kusa vs Safar Harutyunyan (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Safar Harutyunyan.
What opening was played in Jakub Kusa vs Safar Harutyunyan?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (ECO B73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jakub Kusa vs Safar Harutyunyan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.