Oliver Kurmann vs Robert Kempinski
17. OIBM 2013, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oliver Kurmann vs Robert Kempinski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oliver Kurmann (2424)
- Black
- Robert Kempinski (2590)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 17. OIBM 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oliver Kurmann (2424) and Robert Kempinski (2590) was played at 17. OIBM 2013 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oliver Kurmann games or Robert Kempinski games? This Oliver Kurmann vs Robert Kempinski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oliver Kurmann vs Robert Kempinski?
Oliver Kurmann vs Robert Kempinski (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Robert Kempinski.
What opening was played in Oliver Kurmann vs Robert Kempinski?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (ECO B81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oliver Kurmann vs Robert Kempinski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.