Konstantin Kunz vs Kevin Walter
It Staufer Open, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (D92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Konstantin Kunz vs Kevin Walter with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Konstantin Kunz (2263)
- Black
- Kevin Walter (1820)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- It Staufer Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (D92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Konstantin Kunz (2263) and Kevin Walter (1820) was played at It Staufer Open in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (D92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Konstantin Kunz games or Kevin Walter games? This Konstantin Kunz vs Kevin Walter encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Konstantin Kunz vs Kevin Walter?
Konstantin Kunz vs Kevin Walter (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Konstantin Kunz.
What opening was played in Konstantin Kunz vs Kevin Walter?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (ECO D92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Konstantin Kunz vs Kevin Walter, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.