Ekaterina Kulikova vs Gennady Yelovskih
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ekaterina Kulikova vs Gennady Yelovskih with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ekaterina Kulikova (1858)
- Black
- Gennady Yelovskih (1607)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ekaterina Kulikova (1858) and Gennady Yelovskih (1607) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ekaterina Kulikova games or Gennady Yelovskih games? This Ekaterina Kulikova vs Gennady Yelovskih encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ekaterina Kulikova vs Gennady Yelovskih?
Ekaterina Kulikova vs Gennady Yelovskih finished 1–0, a win for Ekaterina Kulikova.
What opening was played in Ekaterina Kulikova vs Gennady Yelovskih?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (ECO D91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ekaterina Kulikova vs Gennady Yelovskih, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.