Kaido Kulaots vs Nikita Meshkovs
Baltic zt III Stage 2018, 2018 · Result 1–0 · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kaido Kulaots vs Nikita Meshkovs with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kaido Kulaots (2555)
- Black
- Nikita Meshkovs (2540)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Baltic zt III Stage 2018
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kaido Kulaots (2555) and Nikita Meshkovs (2540) was played at Baltic zt III Stage 2018 in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kaido Kulaots games or Nikita Meshkovs games? This Kaido Kulaots vs Nikita Meshkovs encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kaido Kulaots vs Nikita Meshkovs?
Kaido Kulaots vs Nikita Meshkovs (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Kaido Kulaots.
What opening was played in Kaido Kulaots vs Nikita Meshkovs?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (ECO C49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kaido Kulaots vs Nikita Meshkovs, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.