Ulrich Kuelkens vs Philippe Boreux
CL/2007/C8, 2007 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ulrich Kuelkens vs Philippe Boreux with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ulrich Kuelkens (2163)
- Black
- Philippe Boreux (1662)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CL/2007/C8
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ulrich Kuelkens (2163) and Philippe Boreux (1662) was played at CL/2007/C8 in 2007 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ulrich Kuelkens games or Philippe Boreux games? This Ulrich Kuelkens vs Philippe Boreux encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ulrich Kuelkens vs Philippe Boreux?
Ulrich Kuelkens vs Philippe Boreux (2007) finished 0–1, a win for Philippe Boreux.
What opening was played in Ulrich Kuelkens vs Philippe Boreux?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ulrich Kuelkens vs Philippe Boreux, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.