Matej Kuchar vs Lukas Stauskas
26. EY BU16 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Matej Kuchar vs Lukas Stauskas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Matej Kuchar (1873)
- Black
- Lukas Stauskas (2235)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 26. EY BU16 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Matej Kuchar (1873) and Lukas Stauskas (2235) was played at 26. EY BU16 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Matej Kuchar games or Lukas Stauskas games? This Matej Kuchar vs Lukas Stauskas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Matej Kuchar vs Lukas Stauskas?
Matej Kuchar vs Lukas Stauskas (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Matej Kuchar.
What opening was played in Matej Kuchar vs Lukas Stauskas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Matej Kuchar vs Lukas Stauskas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.