Adam Thomas Kucera vs Ladislav Zlebcik
Corr CSSR, 1984 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Adam Thomas Kucera vs Ladislav Zlebcik with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adam Thomas Kucera
- Black
- Ladislav Zlebcik (1944)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Corr CSSR
- Year
- 1984
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adam Thomas Kucera and Ladislav Zlebcik (1944) was played at Corr CSSR in 1984 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adam Thomas Kucera games or Ladislav Zlebcik games? This Adam Thomas Kucera vs Ladislav Zlebcik encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adam Thomas Kucera vs Ladislav Zlebcik?
Adam Thomas Kucera vs Ladislav Zlebcik (1984) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Adam Thomas Kucera vs Ladislav Zlebcik?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adam Thomas Kucera vs Ladislav Zlebcik, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.