Petr Kucera vs Tomas Blazek
Open Desko Liberec 2023, 2023 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Petr Kucera vs Tomas Blazek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Petr Kucera (1887)
- Black
- Tomas Blazek (1358)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Open Desko Liberec 2023
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Petr Kucera (1887) and Tomas Blazek (1358) was played at Open Desko Liberec 2023 in 2023 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Petr Kucera games or Tomas Blazek games? This Petr Kucera vs Tomas Blazek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Petr Kucera vs Tomas Blazek?
Petr Kucera vs Tomas Blazek (2023) finished 1–0, a win for Petr Kucera.
What opening was played in Petr Kucera vs Tomas Blazek?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (ECO E65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Petr Kucera vs Tomas Blazek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.