Bernd Krueckeberg vs Peter Rudolph
Hessen Ch qual-D, date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bernd Krueckeberg vs Peter Rudolph with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bernd Krueckeberg (1975)
- Black
- Peter Rudolph (2185)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Hessen Ch qual-D
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bernd Krueckeberg (1975) and Peter Rudolph (2185) was played at Hessen Ch qual-D and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bernd Krueckeberg games or Peter Rudolph games? This Bernd Krueckeberg vs Peter Rudolph encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bernd Krueckeberg vs Peter Rudolph?
Bernd Krueckeberg vs Peter Rudolph finished 0–1, a win for Peter Rudolph.
What opening was played in Bernd Krueckeberg vs Peter Rudolph?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (ECO A39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bernd Krueckeberg vs Peter Rudolph, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.