Grigoriy Krovkin vs Alexandr Triapishko
Sevastopol Waltz Blitz, 2023 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Grigoriy Krovkin vs Alexandr Triapishko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Grigoriy Krovkin (1750)
- Black
- Alexandr Triapishko (2506)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Sevastopol Waltz Blitz
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Grigoriy Krovkin (1750) and Alexandr Triapishko (2506) was played at Sevastopol Waltz Blitz in 2023 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Grigoriy Krovkin games or Alexandr Triapishko games? This Grigoriy Krovkin vs Alexandr Triapishko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Grigoriy Krovkin vs Alexandr Triapishko?
Grigoriy Krovkin vs Alexandr Triapishko (2023) finished 0–1, a win for Alexandr Triapishko.
What opening was played in Grigoriy Krovkin vs Alexandr Triapishko?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (ECO E14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Grigoriy Krovkin vs Alexandr Triapishko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.