Ricardo Kropff vs Nahuel Diaz Hollemaert
3. Copa Roggio A, 2010 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E95).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ricardo Kropff vs Nahuel Diaz Hollemaert with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ricardo Kropff (2300)
- Black
- Nahuel Diaz Hollemaert (2451)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 3. Copa Roggio A
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E95)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ricardo Kropff (2300) and Nahuel Diaz Hollemaert (2451) was played at 3. Copa Roggio A in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E95). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ricardo Kropff games or Nahuel Diaz Hollemaert games? This Ricardo Kropff vs Nahuel Diaz Hollemaert encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ricardo Kropff vs Nahuel Diaz Hollemaert?
Ricardo Kropff vs Nahuel Diaz Hollemaert (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ricardo Kropff vs Nahuel Diaz Hollemaert?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E95).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ricardo Kropff vs Nahuel Diaz Hollemaert, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.