Francisco J Krohn Montalvo vs Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo
2010 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Closed (C88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco J Krohn Montalvo vs Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco J Krohn Montalvo (1942)
- Black
- Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo (1727)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed (C88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco J Krohn Montalvo (1942) and Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo (1727) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed (C88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco J Krohn Montalvo games or Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo games? This Francisco J Krohn Montalvo vs Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco J Krohn Montalvo vs Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo?
Francisco J Krohn Montalvo vs Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo.
What opening was played in Francisco J Krohn Montalvo vs Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed (ECO C88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco J Krohn Montalvo vs Fernando A. Legaspi Rodrigo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.